Up Prev Next
From: Michael Peppler <mpeppler at peppler dot org>
Subject: Re: dbrpcsend without dbsqlok
Date: Aug 31 1999 8:48PM
WORENKLEIN, David, GCM writes:
> Mike --
> In dblib.xs, you say
> /* temporay [sic] solution: call dbsqlok() directly after
> dbrpcsend() */
> I think it's time to find a more permanent solution. I need to call
> dbrpcsend(), dbpoll() at intervals until something comes back, and then call
> There are two ways to do this that maintain backwards compatibility:
> 1. A new function, dbrpcsendnook
> 2. An optional second parameter, no_dbsqlok.
> The second looks better to me.
> I've hacked up my 2.10, and I clean up the dbrpcparam list before calling
> dbsqlok. I haven't had any problems with it yet, but I haven't purified my
> code, either.
I also like the second solution best.
How 'bout sending me your diffs?
Michael Peppler -||- Data Migrations Inc.
email@example.com -||- http://www.mbay.net/~mpeppler
Int. Sybase User Group -||- http://www.isug.com
Sybase on Linux mailing list: firstname.lastname@example.org