|
|
sybperl-l Archive
Up Prev Next
From: "WORENKLEIN, David, GCM" <David dot Worenklein at gcm dot com>
Subject: RE: sybperl vs. isql
Date: Apr 16 1999 3:31PM
You could also run isql, pipe the output to your speaker, stick a microphone
next to it, record the noise, and transform it back into data.
But why do that when you can have your entire Sybase interface in one
process?
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam.Vile@barclayscapital.com
[SMTP:Adam.Vile@barclayscapital.com]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 1999 11:01 AM
To: SybPerl Discussion List
Subject: sybperl vs. isql
Something has been bothering me, so I thought I would share it.
I am (I believe) a competent Perl programmer and would use Perl for
all of
my scripting needs if I could. I have used sybperl (and its
derivatives)
successfully but I can't help wondering why. Wouldn't opening an
isql
filehandle be just as good? Can anybody argue successfully for my
continued
used of sybperl?
Cheers
Adam
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
Group
does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
message.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and
do
not necessarily represent those of the Barclays Group unless
otherwise
specifically stated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
|
