Michael Peppler
Sybase Consulting
Sybase on Linux
Install Guide for Sybase on Linux
General Sybase Resources
General Perl Resources
BCP Tool
Bug Tracker
Mailing List Archive
Downloads Directory
Sybase on Linux FAQ
Sybperl FAQ
Michael Peppler's resume

sybperl-l Archive

Up    Prev    Next    

From: Tom Poindexter <poindexter dot tom at tci dot com>
Subject: Re: Unix/MS SQL Server connectivity
Date: May 29 1998 11:19PM

On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 03:51:01PM -0700, Michael Peppler wrote:

> How many DBlibrary apps are there still out there? Sybase wouldb't get 
> a way with deciding that SQL Server (or 12.x) will not work at
> all with DBlibrary (of course Sybase doesn't have MS's clout :-)
>  >       Redbrick: up to 5.x    Sybase's DB-Lib through an open server
>  > 		5.0.12       DB-Lib and native ODBC (even on Unix), warning 
>  > 				that DB-Lib going away
>  > 		5.0.15       DB-Lib gone, only ODBC
> Meaning that the server was capable of understanding multiple
> protocols (TDS for DBlibrary, and something else for the native ODBC
> stuff). I don't know if MS-SQL 6.x works the same way. If it does (ie

I've only started working with RedBrick at 5.0.x, so I don't know all of
its history.  Up to 5.0.12, RedBrick licensed Sybase's Open Server code
for it's interface (gee, just like Sybase alway touted :)  The Open Server ran
as a separate process.  RB now has a native ODBC interface, which runs
as another process.  Each in turn connects to the database server using (?,
pipes, shared mem, whatever?)

I have no idea how MS-SQL server works.

> But I still think that dropping backwards compatibility is a stupid
> thing to do...

Agreed.  And that's my point also.  I think Sybase would be stupid to
completely drop DB-Lib.  And I also gave hell to the RB sales folks
about dropping the Open Server/DB-Lib interface.

Concerning Microsoft: they would be unwise (at least in the eyes of us 
techies) to drop DB-Lib support.  However, MS has more of a track record 
of "upgrade or risk falling behind".

Tom Poindexter